Furthermore, they did not appear on, when the application was fixed yet again, following the filing of a supplementary affidavit in further support of the present application, with directions of the Court that this is served on the respondents so that they were notified of the new date, which duly took place. Despite the fact that the application was served on the respondents they chose not to appear in Court.

The Court, in exercising its discretionary power, ordered that notice of the application be given to the other party and for this purpose fixed the application on. On the same day, the applicants filed an ex-parte application seeking the issue of orders staying the execution of the abovementioned decision of the respondents “until the hearing and completion of the recourse of the applicants and/or until the hearing of the present interim application”.

PANAYI, J.: The applicants, with a recourse filed on, seek the annulment of the decision of the respondents dated, whereby the latter placed on the website “http: ” a list which included the electronic addresses of the applicants, and “http: whereby CYTACOM Solutions Ltd, a company that provides internet services to the clients of the applicants, was obliged to apply a blocking system on the website of the applicants, thus preventing the clients-users of the applicants from accessing the services provided by the applicants. 72(I)/2003 AND ON THE GAMBLING LAW OF 2012 ĮX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUE OF AN INTERIM ORDER DATED Īndros Pelecanos and Yiannis Polychronis for the applicants. IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 1A, 12, 17, 25, 26, 28, 33, 35, 169(3) AND 179(2) AND 146 OF THE CONSTITUTION AND ARTICLES 49, 56, 101 AND 102 OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE E.U., DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC FOR LAYING DOWN A PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS AND OF RULES ON INFORMATION SOCIETY SERVICES AND ON THE CORRESPONDING LAW ON THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN RELATION TO CERTAIN TECHNICAL RULES OF 2003 L.

REVISIONARY JURISDICTION (Case No.: 492/2013) Betfair International PLC and Republic of Cyprus - Judgement - Online Gambling

Online casino cyprus jurisdiction